MIL ABHISHEK BANVARILAL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 279/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT020011312026

Case disposed

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

279/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

BHUJ CITY A DIVISION POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

MIL ABHISHEK BANVARILAL

Adv. D R PATHAK

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj-Kutch granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 497 to recover an ASUS VivoBook 14 laptop seized during investigation (FIR No. 134/2026). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on bills and Aadhaar documentation, and that prolonged police custody risked damage to the equipment. The court ordered conditional release of the laptop to the applicant upon furnishing bond and security equivalent to 1.5 times the laptop's value, with strict conditions prohibiting sale or transfer until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj-Kutch granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 497 to recover an ASUS VivoBook 14 laptop seized during investigation (FIR No. 134/2026). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on bills and Aadhaar documentation, and that prolonged police custody risked damage to the equipment. The court ordered conditional release of the laptop to the applicant upon furnishing bond and security equivalent to 1.5 times the laptop's value, with strict conditions prohibiting sale or transfer until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case