VASANI HEET RAJESHKUMAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 194/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT020008842026

Filing Number

194/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASANI HEET RAJESHKUMAR

    Adv. S I TURIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court approved the applicant Vasani Rajeshkumar's petition under BNS Section 497, ordering the release of frozen funds (₹5,058 from Kotak Mahindra Bank and ₹4,999 from Utkarsh Small Finance Bank) totaling ₹10,057 that were seized in a cybercrime case. The court found the applicant was a victim of cybercrime, the suspect account showed no ownership disputes, and prolonged freezing would cause financial hardship; release is conditioned on furnishing personal bond at 1.5x the amount and surety bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court approved the applicant Vasani Rajeshkumar's petition under BNS Section 497, ordering the release of frozen funds (₹5,058 from Kotak Mahindra Bank and ₹4,999 from Utkarsh Small Finance Bank) totaling ₹10,057 that were seized in a cybercrime case. The court found the applicant was a victim of cybercrime, the suspect account showed no ownership disputes, and prolonged freezing would cause financial hardship; release is conditioned on furnishing personal bond at 1.5x the amount and surety bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case