Government of Gujarat vs MUSTAK S/O HASAM SAMA — 385/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020005542026

Filing Number

385/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

385/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

45-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205043251399

Police Station

BHUJ CITY B DIVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAK S/O HASAM SAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Bhuj, Kutch convicted the accused Mustak Hasam under IPC Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for a petty offense, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in a special lok adalat. Considering the accused's first-time offense status and no criminal history, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Bhuj, Kutch convicted the accused Mustak Hasam under IPC Section 185 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for a petty offense, after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in a special lok adalat. Considering the accused's first-time offense status and no criminal history, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹1,000 fine, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case