VASANI ANKITKUMAR ARVINDBHAI vs NOT KNOW — 563/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Applicants Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Applicants Evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKT010055972023

Filing Number

563/2023

Filing Date

01-Dec-2023

Registration No

563/2023

Registration Date

01-Dec-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

26-3rd Addl District Judge

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASANI ANKITKUMAR ARVINDBHAI

    Adv. M R LAKHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NOT KNOW

  2. 2.AKIB JAVED PADHIYAR

    Adv. EX PARTY

  3. 3.IFFCO-TOKOI GENERAL INSU CO LTD BHUJ

    Adv. A A SAHEDANI

  4. 4.NODAL OFFICER IFFCO-TOKOI GENERAL INSU CO LTD BHUJ

    Adv. A A SAHEDANI

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 01-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Appellant

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Appellant

    6th Addl District Judge

  10. 07-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: In MACP No. 563/2023, the 8th Auxiliary MACT, Bhuj-Kutch adjourned the motor accident claim petition after May 2025. The presiding judge stated that trial proceedings at the station conflict with Supreme Court directives and cited her conscience prevents continuing work against apex court verdicts, compelling her to abstain from conducting trials until her tenure ends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Appellant

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Appellant

    8th Addl District Judge

  13. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Appellant

    8th Addl District Judge

  14. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Appellant

    8th Addl District Judge

  15. 30-Apr-2024

    Reply

    8th Addl District Judge

  16. 19-Mar-2024

    Reply

    8th Addl District Judge

  17. 29-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 01-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 563/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MACP No. 563/2023, the 8th Auxiliary MACT, Bhuj-Kutch adjourned the motor accident claim petition after May 2025. The presiding judge stated that trial proceedings at the station conflict with Supreme Court directives and cited her conscience prevents continuing work against apex court verdicts, compelling her to abstain from conducting trials until her tenure ends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case