Government of Gujarat vs MAMATABA D/O NATVARSINH JADEJA Advocate - S T PATEL — 102/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,498A,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJKT010051452021
Filing Number
102/2021
Filing Date
29-Nov-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
29-Nov-2021
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
26-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205036210353
Police Station
NALIYA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAMATABA D/O NATVARSINH JADEJA Advocate - S T PATEL
-
2.DIGVIJAYSINH S/O KIRTISINH GOHIL
Adv. S T PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Judegement
Summary of Court Decision The Session Court of Bhuj, Kutch acquitted both accused (Mmataba Natvarsinh Jadeja and Digvijaysinh Kirtisingh Gohil) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 498(A), and 114. The court found that while the deceased did commit suicide by hanging, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused instigated or abetted the suicide through cruelty or harassment. Key witnesses (deceased's father and husband) did not corroborate allegations of domestic abuse or mental/physical torture, making the chain of evidence insufficient under Indian Penal Code provisions for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2026
Judgement
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Further Statement
6th Addl District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
28-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
16-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
5th Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Sep-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Aug-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jul-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jun-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jun-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
28-Apr-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
8th Addl District Judge
-
30-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2021
Summary of Court Decision The Session Court of Bhuj, Kutch acquitted both accused (Mmataba Natvarsinh Jadeja and Digvijaysinh Kirtisingh Gohil) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 498(A), and 114. The court found that while the deceased did commit suicide by hanging, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused instigated or abetted the suicide through cruelty or harassment. Key witnesses (deceased's father and husband) did not corroborate allegations of domestic abuse or mental/physical torture, making the chain of evidence insufficient under Indian Penal Code provisions for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts