SUMAR SANYA GADHAVI vs JOISAR DAYARAM SHIVJI Advocate - K M DHUVA — 169/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJKT010050062025
Filing Number
169/2025
Filing Date
01-Nov-2025
Registration No
169/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMAR SANYA GADHAVI
Adv. D N BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.JOISAR DAYARAM SHIVJI Advocate - K M DHUVA
-
2.Government of Gujarat
Adv. D J THACKER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Sessions Court allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction of Sumar Sanya Gadhavi under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after both parties reached a settlement and the complainant received full compensation. The court permitted the appellant to compound the offense based on the Supreme Court's precedent and exempted him from costs due to his financial hardship, ordering his immediate release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 169/2025
The Sessions Court allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction of Sumar Sanya Gadhavi under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after both parties reached a settlement and the complainant received full compensation. The court permitted the appellant to compound the offense based on the Supreme Court's precedent and exempted him from costs due to his financial hardship, ordering his immediate release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts