Government of Gujarat vs VIPULKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BARASARA Advocate - H C CHAUDHARY, B R TRIVEDI — 11/2021
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7,12,13(1)(A),13(2). Status: Final Arguments. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
ACB - SPECIAL CASE - ACB
CNR: GJKT010049472021
Filing Number
11/2021
Filing Date
15-Nov-2021
Registration No
11/2021
Registration Date
15-Nov-2021
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
29-4th Addl District Judge
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
BHUJ ACB POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. H B JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIPULKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BARASARA Advocate - H C CHAUDHARY, B R TRIVEDI
-
2.CHANDRAKANT KANILAL NISHAD
Adv. H C CHAUDHARY,B R TRIVEDI
Case History
-
31-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jun-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
01-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
6th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
-
21-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
7th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Further Statement
7th Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Further Statement
7th Addl District Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: 11/2021 Court: High Court (Gujarat) - Criminal Section Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: VIPULKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BARASARA (Advocate) and others including H.C. CHAUDHARY, B.R. TRIVEDI, CHANDRAKANT KANILAL NISHAD Outcome: The court dismissed the petition. The examination-in-chief of the accused witness concluded, and cross-examination proceedings were recorded. The case proceeded through its regular judicial process without granting any extraordinary relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
OrderView PDF
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
20-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
OrderView PDF
-
26-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
12-May-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jan-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Dec-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Oct-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-May-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
8th Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2021
Case Summary Case No.: 11/2021 Court: High Court (Gujarat) - Criminal Section Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondent: VIPULKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BARASARA (Advocate) and others including H.C. CHAUDHARY, B.R. TRIVEDI, CHANDRAKANT KANILAL NISHAD Outcome: The court dismissed the petition. The examination-in-chief of the accused witness concluded, and cross-examination proceedings were recorded. The case proceeded through its regular judicial process without granting any extraordinary relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts