NAVIN GOVIND VADHIYARA vs JAMNABEN RAJUBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A R MALEK — 161/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJKT010048172025
Filing Number
161/2025
Filing Date
14-Oct-2025
Registration No
161/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAVIN GOVIND VADHIYARA
Adv. S S CHAKI
-
2.KANTABEN GOVIND VADHIYARA
Adv. S S CHAKI
-
3.GOVIND SHIVA VADHIYAR
Adv. S S CHAKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAMNABEN RAJUBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A R MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the husband and in-laws against a lower court's partial order granting relief to the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Sessions Court upheld the magistrate's decision, finding credible evidence that the wife suffered domestic violence and was entitled to compensation of ₹15,000, monthly maintenance of ₹3,000, and ₹1,000 case costs, while rejecting the appellants' arguments that the brief three-day marriage and previous family court dismissal of maintenance claims negated the domestic violence claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
For R&P
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 161/2025
Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the husband and in-laws against a lower court's partial order granting relief to the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Sessions Court upheld the magistrate's decision, finding credible evidence that the wife suffered domestic violence and was entitled to compensation of ₹15,000, monthly maintenance of ₹3,000, and ₹1,000 case costs, while rejecting the appellants' arguments that the brief three-day marriage and previous family court dismissal of maintenance claims negated the domestic violence claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts