IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs KIRITSINH JILUBHA CHAUHAN — 71/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJKT010040972025
Filing Number
71/2025
Filing Date
28-Aug-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
28-Aug-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
29-7th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. S H GUJARATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRITSINH JILUBHA CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional District Judge at Bhuj-Kachchh disposed of Civil Execution (MACP) Petition No. 71/2025 as withdrawn, based on a withdrawal request submitted by the Decree Holder's counsel. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
7th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2025
The Additional District Judge at Bhuj-Kachchh disposed of Civil Execution (MACP) Petition No. 71/2025 as withdrawn, based on a withdrawal request submitted by the Decree Holder's counsel. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts