JAYABEN SURESHKUMAR MOTA vs ANKUR JAYNTIBHAI KOTHIYA Advocate - L D MAHESHWARI — 195/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKT010036202022

Filing Number

195/2022

Filing Date

12-May-2022

Registration No

195/2022

Registration Date

12-May-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYABEN SURESHKUMAR MOTA

    Adv. M B KHATANA

  2. 2.KIRANBHAI SURESHBHAI MOTA

    Adv. M B KHATANA

  3. 3.SUNIL SURESH MOTA

    Adv. M B KHATANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANKUR JAYNTIBHAI KOTHIYA Advocate - L D MAHESHWARI

  2. 2.BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. D K BUCH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 10,51,000 to the legal heirs of a 60-year-old rickshaw driver killed in a 2022 collision with a car. The tribunal held the car driver solely negligent based on FIR, scene panchnama, and post-mortem evidence showing the car crossed into the wrong lane at high speed, and rejected the insurance company's contributory negligence claims. Compensation was calculated based on the deceased's monthly income of Rs. 11,000 from operating his own rickshaw, with a multiplier of 9 for his age group, plus conventional heads for loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium for the widow and two sons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  16. 27-Oct-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District Judge

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    7th Addl District Judge

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    7th Addl District Judge

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    7th Addl District Judge

  20. 02-May-2025

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 22-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 18-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 05-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 22-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 14-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 29-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  29. 26-Mar-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  30. 04-Mar-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  31. 07-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  32. 03-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  33. 06-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  34. 25-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  35. 27-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  36. 23-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  37. 02-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  38. 11-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  39. 29-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  40. 15-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  41. 11-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  42. 07-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  43. 10-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  44. 15-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  45. 24-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  46. 18-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  47. 13-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 12-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 10,51,000 to the legal heirs of a 60-year-old rickshaw driver killed in a 2022 collision with a car. The tribunal held the car driver solely negligent based on FIR, scene panchnama, and post-mortem evidence showing the car crossed into the wrong lane at high speed, and rejected the insurance company's contributory negligence claims. Compensation was calculated based on the deceased's monthly income of Rs. 11,000 from operating his own rickshaw, with a multiplier of 9 for his age group, plus conventional heads for loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium for the widow and two sons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case