BABUBHAI SAMAT MAHESHWARI vs KARAN PARBAT FUFAL — 44/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJKT010032092025
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
07-Jul-2025
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
07-Jul-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABUBHAI SAMAT MAHESHWARI
Adv. M A SAIYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARAN PARBAT FUFAL
-
2.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. A A SAHEDANI
-
3.DHARMENDRA BHARA PARALIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bhuj disposed of execution petition MACEX No.44/2025 after the decree holder's advocate withdrew the petition, confirming that the insurance company had deposited the awarded amount in full. No further proceedings were necessary as the execution petition was satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
7th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2025
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bhuj disposed of execution petition MACEX No.44/2025 after the decree holder's advocate withdrew the petition, confirming that the insurance company had deposited the awarded amount in full. No further proceedings were necessary as the execution petition was satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts