SHYAM SURESHBHAI JOGI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP, H B JADEJA, H B JADEJAN M BHIL, — 667/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd June 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKT010021282026
Filing Number
667/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
667/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
25-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205035260091
Police Station
NAKHATRANA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM SURESHBHAI JOGI
Adv. A R MALEK
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), H B JADEJA, H B JADEJAN M BHIL,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 667/2026 Decision: The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Shyam Sureshbhai Jogi, accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a 16-year-old minor girl under POCSO Act provisions, after finding investigation complete with charge-sheet filed and no custody requirement. The bail was conditional on a ₹15,000 bond and strict conditions including prohibition from entering Nakhatrana Taluka, monthly police reporting, and no contact with the complainant or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
01-Jun-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
29-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
27-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
26-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
25-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 667/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 667/2026 Decision: The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Shyam Sureshbhai Jogi, accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a 16-year-old minor girl under POCSO Act provisions, after finding investigation complete with charge-sheet filed and no custody requirement. The bail was conditional on a ₹15,000 bond and strict conditions including prohibition from entering Nakhatrana Taluka, monthly police reporting, and no contact with the complainant or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts