Government of Gujarat vs BALAVANTSINH DHIRUBHA JADEJA Advocate - R S GADHVI — 10/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(B),506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJKT010021082022
Filing Number
10/2022
Filing Date
17-03-2022
Registration No
10/2022
Registration Date
17-03-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
31-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205032211376
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BALAVANTSINH DHIRUBHA JADEJA Advocate - R S GADHVI
Hearing History
Judge: 31-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 31-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 12-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Balvantsinh Kherubha Jadeja of charges under IPC sections 323, 294(B), 506(2), 114, and the SC/ST Atrocities Act 1989. Finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, the judge held that the complainant's testimony contradicted itself during cross-examination, and corroborating witnesses had inconsistencies that undermined the credibility of the allegations regarding assault, abusive language, and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Balvantsinh Kherubha Jadeja of charges under IPC sections 323, 294(B), 506(2), 114, and the SC/ST Atrocities Act 1989. Finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, the judge held that the complainant's testimony contradicted itself during cross-examination, and corroborating witnesses had inconsistencies that undermined the credibility of the allegations regarding assault, abusive language, and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts