ASHOK LILADHAR KANAD vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP, A R DESAI, A R DESAID V GADHVI, — 327/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKT010011032026
Filing Number
327/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
327/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
25-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205032210048
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK LILADHAR KANAD
Adv. B S GORDIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), A R DESAI, A R DESAID V GADHVI,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh rejected the interim bail application of Ashok Liladhar Kanad, accused in a serious custodial death case involving charges under IPC Sections 302, 343, 326, 330, 331, 212, 201, 34, 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the charges extremely serious, noted the accused's poor jail conduct with two punishments, rejected his claims about mother's medical emergency (citing outdated medical reports and available family support), and expressed concern about flight risk given a co-accused's prior absconding and recent witness intimidation incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 327/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh rejected the interim bail application of Ashok Liladhar Kanad, accused in a serious custodial death case involving charges under IPC Sections 302, 343, 326, 330, 331, 212, 201, 34, 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found the charges extremely serious, noted the accused's poor jail conduct with two punishments, rejected his claims about mother's medical emergency (citing outdated medical reports and available family support), and expressed concern about flight risk given a co-accused's prior absconding and recent witness intimidation incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts