ATARSING SUNDARSING POSHATA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 326/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT010011012026

Filing Number

326/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

326/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

31-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205013260106

Police Station

BHUJ TALUKA MANKUVA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATARSING SUNDARSING POSHATA

    Adv. H C CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Atarsingh Sundarsingh Posata in a suicide abetment case (IPC Sections 306, 114). The judge found insufficient prima facie evidence against the accused, noting that the 22-month delay in filing the FIR, the deceased's non-mention of the applicant in the suicide note, lack of direct supervisory relationship between them, and the applicant's clean criminal record warranted bail on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 326/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Atarsingh Sundarsingh Posata in a suicide abetment case (IPC Sections 306, 114). The judge found insufficient prima facie evidence against the accused, noting that the 22-month delay in filing the FIR, the deceased's non-mention of the applicant in the suicide note, lack of direct supervisory relationship between them, and the applicant's clean criminal record warranted bail on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case