DEVANG DILIPBHAI CHAVDA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 323/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKT010010812026
Filing Number
323/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
323/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993003260047
Police Station
ANJAR POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVANG DILIPBHAI CHAVDA
Adv. K J MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge & Special Judge (GCTOC Act), Kachchh dismissed the regular bail application of Devang Dilipbhai Chavda, finding prima facie evidence that he is a member of an organized crime syndicate under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Act. The court rejected the applicant's arguments of innocence and lack of involvement, concluding that five registered offenses punishable for more than three years, committed with syndicate members, attract GCTOC provisions and justify continued custody due to flight risk and witness tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 323/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge & Special Judge (GCTOC Act), Kachchh dismissed the regular bail application of Devang Dilipbhai Chavda, finding prima facie evidence that he is a member of an organized crime syndicate under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Act. The court rejected the applicant's arguments of innocence and lack of involvement, concluding that five registered offenses punishable for more than three years, committed with syndicate members, attract GCTOC provisions and justify continued custody due to flight risk and witness tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts