ABDUL JUMA NOTIYAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 322/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT010010792026

Filing Number

322/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

322/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

31-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205043251396

Police Station

BHUJ CITY B DIVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL JUMA NOTIYAR

    Adv. I A SAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Kachchh at Bhuj granted regular bail to Abdul Juma Notiyar under Section 483 of BNSS for offences including cheating and criminal intimidation. The court held that prolonged custody served no fruitful purpose given the nature of offences and prescribed punishment, and that the trial could proceed without detention. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with stringent conditions including monthly police station check-ins for six months, passport surrender, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 322/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Kachchh at Bhuj granted regular bail to Abdul Juma Notiyar under Section 483 of BNSS for offences including cheating and criminal intimidation. The court held that prolonged custody served no fruitful purpose given the nature of offences and prescribed punishment, and that the trial could proceed without detention. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with stringent conditions including monthly police station check-ins for six months, passport surrender, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case