LATIF MAMAD SUMRA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 26/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJKT010010012026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ
Judge
31-8th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205032251773
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LATIF MAMAD SUMRA
Adv. K P GADHAVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The 8th Additional Sessions Judge at Bhuj allowed the applicant Latif Mamad Sumra's revision application and ordered the release of his seized truck (Registration No. GJ-12-BZ-8554) on conditional bail. The court found that since no contraband liquor was actually recovered from the vehicle itself—only nearby—Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act did not apply to bar its release, and the trial court's rejection order was erroneous. The truck was released subject to a bond of 1.5 times its value and conditions including non-transfer and production before authorities as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
8th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
8th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
8th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
The 8th Additional Sessions Judge at Bhuj allowed the applicant Latif Mamad Sumra's revision application and ordered the release of his seized truck (Registration No. GJ-12-BZ-8554) on conditional bail. The court found that since no contraband liquor was actually recovered from the vehicle itself—only nearby—Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act did not apply to bar its release, and the trial court's rejection order was erroneous. The truck was released subject to a bond of 1.5 times its value and conditions including non-transfer and production before authorities as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts