CCL T/H PUNAMDEVI DEVENDRA RAAY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP, D J THACKER — 46/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKT010010002026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

25-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993007251751

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CCL T/H PUNAMDEVI DEVENDRA RAAY

    Adv. K V DOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), D J THACKER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh dismissed a criminal appeal filed by a child in conflict with law against a bail rejection order, due to the appellant's consistent failure to appear for four consecutive hearings without justification or adjournment request. The court found the appellant disinterested in prosecuting the case and ordered the appeal dismissed for default for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh dismissed a criminal appeal filed by a child in conflict with law against a bail rejection order, due to the appellant's consistent failure to appear for four consecutive hearings without justification or adjournment request. The court found the appellant disinterested in prosecuting the case and ordered the appeal dismissed for default for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case