FORAM D/O BHUPENDRA GANATRA W/O KALPESH CHOTHANI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D J THACKER — 217/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPL - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT010006782026

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FORAM D/O BHUPENDRA GANATRA W/O KALPESH CHOTHANI

    Adv. S R RATHOD

  2. 2.TWISHI D/O KALPESH CHOTHANI T/H FORAM KALPESH CHOTHANI

    Adv. S R RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D J THACKER

  2. 2.KALPESH KISHORBHAI CHOTHANI

    Adv. K P GADHAVI

  3. 3.KISHORBHAI VALLABHDAS CHOTHANI

    Adv. K P GADHAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Kachchh (Bhuj) disposed of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 217/2026 as withdrawn on March 13, 2026. The applicant's advocate withdrew the bail application after deciding to file a fresh application at Bhuj instead of pursuing the transfer of the matter from Mandvi, both on the same grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Kachchh (Bhuj) disposed of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 217/2026 as withdrawn on March 13, 2026. The applicant's advocate withdrew the bail application after deciding to file a fresh application at Bhuj instead of pursuing the transfer of the matter from Mandvi, both on the same grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case