Government of Gujarat vs JUSHAB URFE JUSSO GULAM SHIRU Advocate - S M KHANNA — 6/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(M),65(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJKT010005612026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

25-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205031250483

Police Station

MANDVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(M),65(1),351(3)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4(2),5(J)(II),5(L),6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP, H B JADEJA, M T GADHVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUSHAB URFE JUSSO GULAM SHIRU Advocate - S M KHANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (POCSO) at Bhuj-Kachchh acquitted accused Jushab @ Jusso Shiru Gulam Shiru of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident and failed to establish that the accused committed sexual assault against her beyond reasonable doubt. Critically, DNA testing excluded the accused as the biological father of the victim's child, and the victim herself, along with her parents, testified that no sexual assault occurred—contradicting the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  9. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  10. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  12. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  14. 06-Mar-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  15. 28-Feb-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  16. 24-Feb-2026

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl. District Judge

  17. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (POCSO) at Bhuj-Kachchh acquitted accused Jushab @ Jusso Shiru Gulam Shiru of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident and failed to establish that the accused committed sexual assault against her beyond reasonable doubt. Critically, DNA testing excluded the accused as the biological father of the victim's child, and the victim herself, along with her parents, testified that no sexual assault occurred—contradicting the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case