SABIR MAHAMAD SALIM MATHDA T/H MAHMAD SALIM JUSAB MATHADA vs JUSAB MOD MATHDA — 23/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKT010003262023

Filing Number

23/2023

Filing Date

12-Jan-2023

Registration No

23/2023

Registration Date

12-Jan-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BHUJ

Judge

31-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABIR MAHAMAD SALIM MATHDA T/H MAHMAD SALIM JUSAB MATHADA

    Adv. M A SAIYAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUSAB MOD MATHDA

  2. 2.ALIMAMAD MOD MATHDA

  3. 3.MEGMA HDI GENERAL ISNURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. G R PRAJAPATI

  4. 4.NODEL OFFICER MEGMA HDI GENERAL ISNURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. G R PRAJAPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Bhuj awarded Rs. 2,50,000 (the statutory minimum for grievous hurt under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 2019) to a 17-year-old claimant who sustained brain injuries in a motorcycle accident on 08.11.2022. The court held the driver, owner, and insurer (MEGMA HDI General Insurance Co. Ltd.) jointly and severally liable, awarding 7% interest per annum from the petition date, with 60% of compensation invested in a fixed deposit for five years and 40% paid immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  17. 23-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  18. 02-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    8th Addl District Judge

  20. 01-Jul-2025

    Reply

    8th Addl District Judge

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Reply

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 12-Feb-2025

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 11-Dec-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 09-Oct-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 10-Jul-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 01-May-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  29. 03-Apr-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  30. 20-Mar-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  31. 14-Feb-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  32. 17-Jan-2024

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  33. 20-Dec-2023

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  34. 08-Nov-2023

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  35. 20-Sep-2023

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  36. 09-Aug-2023

    Reply

    6th Addl District Judge

  37. 10-Jul-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  38. 08-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  39. 13-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 12-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Bhuj awarded Rs. 2,50,000 (the statutory minimum for grievous hurt under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 2019) to a 17-year-old claimant who sustained brain injuries in a motorcycle accident on 08.11.2022. The court held the driver, owner, and insurer (MEGMA HDI General Insurance Co. Ltd.) jointly and severally liable, awarding 7% interest per annum from the petition date, with 60% of compensation invested in a fixed deposit for five years and 40% paid immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case