RAJESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR vs IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - R G DAVE — 92/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH180013662025

Case disposed

Filing Number

92/2025

Filing Date

09-12-2025

Registration No

92/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

RAJESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PARMAR

Adv. R J MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - R G DAVE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

05-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

26-02-2026

URGENT HEARING

12-02-2026

URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional District Court at Kapadwanj approved a compromise order in the insurance dispute between petitioner Rajeshkumar Rameshbhai Parmar and IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., directing the insurer to pay Rs. 3,90,450/- with Rs. 1,95,250/- disbursed directly to the petitioner and Rs. 1,95,200/- invested in a 5-year fixed deposit in his name. The court imposed conditions requiring personal verification at payment, prohibiting loans against the FD without tribunal permission, and directing the bank to credit periodic interest to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Court at Kapadwanj approved a compromise order in the insurance dispute between petitioner Rajeshkumar Rameshbhai Parmar and IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., directing the insurer to pay Rs. 3,90,450/- with Rs. 1,95,250/- disbursed directly to the petitioner and Rs. 1,95,200/- invested in a 5-year fixed deposit in his name. The court imposed conditions requiring personal verification at payment, prohibiting loans against the FD without tribunal permission, and directing the bank to credit periodic interest to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case