STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAUDBHAI BECHARBHAI KHRISTI Advocate - J B MARVADI — 5/2023
Case under Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)(5-A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th May 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJKH180011032023
Filing Number
5/2023
Filing Date
22-Aug-2023
Registration No
5/2023
Registration Date
22-Aug-2023
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204027230372
Police Station
KATHLAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. M R PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAUDBHAI BECHARBHAI KHRISTI Advocate - J B MARVADI
-
2.SHARDABEN DAUDBHAI KHRISTI
Adv. J B MARVADI
-
3.SHIRILBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR
Adv. M K SHAH
-
4.VIJAYBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR
Adv. M K SHAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of State of Gujarat v. Daudbhai Becharbhai Khristi (Sp. Atro. Case 5/2023) The court acquitted all four accused charged under SC/ST Atrocity Prevention Act and IPC sections. The alleged victim, a Scheduled Caste individual, was allegedly assaulted and subjected to caste-based insults by the accused. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements required under the SC/ST Atrocity Act—specifically, that the accused acted with knowledge of the victim's caste and intentional hatred. Medical and witness evidence proved contradictory and inconclusive regarding injuries and derogatory speech used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
05-May-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Addl. District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Further Statement
Addl. District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
28-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
14-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Apr-2024
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Jan-2024
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2023
Summary of State of Gujarat v. Daudbhai Becharbhai Khristi (Sp. Atro. Case 5/2023) The court acquitted all four accused charged under SC/ST Atrocity Prevention Act and IPC sections. The alleged victim, a Scheduled Caste individual, was allegedly assaulted and subjected to caste-based insults by the accused. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements required under the SC/ST Atrocity Act—specifically, that the accused acted with knowledge of the victim's caste and intentional hatred. Medical and witness evidence proved contradictory and inconclusive regarding injuries and derogatory speech used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts