PRITESH RAMESHCHANDRA MODI AUTHO. REPR. OF EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 27/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH180010972025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRITESH RAMESHCHANDRA MODI AUTHO. REPR. OF EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.
Adv. S R SHARMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL
THE POLICE INSPECTOR
SAHID USMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER ON URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER ON URGENT HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 29-01-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court, in Criminal Revision Application No. 27/2025, quashed the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, which had directed seizure of a vehicle under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court's order violated the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples and Determination of Quantity Seized Liquor) Rules, 2012, which mandate that seized liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be finally confiscated until a conclusive judgment is delivered. Since the final judgment had not been rendered in the underlying criminal case, the seizure order was premature and legally unjustified, prompting the court to nullify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court, in Criminal Revision Application No. 27/2025, quashed the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, which had directed seizure of a vehicle under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court's order violated the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples and Determination of Quantity Seized Liquor) Rules, 2012, which mandate that seized liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be finally confiscated until a conclusive judgment is delivered. Since the final judgment had not been rendered in the underlying criminal case, the seizure order was premature and legally unjustified, prompting the court to nullify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts