PRITESH RAMESHCHANDRA MODI AUTHO. REPR. OF EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 27/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH180010972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

27/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2025

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 438,

Petitioner(s)

PRITESH RAMESHCHANDRA MODI AUTHO. REPR. OF EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.

Adv. S R SHARMA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL

THE POLICE INSPECTOR

SAHID USMAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER ON URGENT HEARING

26-02-2026

URGENT HEARING

12-02-2026

URGENT HEARING

29-01-2026

URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court, in Criminal Revision Application No. 27/2025, quashed the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, which had directed seizure of a vehicle under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court's order violated the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples and Determination of Quantity Seized Liquor) Rules, 2012, which mandate that seized liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be finally confiscated until a conclusive judgment is delivered. Since the final judgment had not been rendered in the underlying criminal case, the seizure order was premature and legally unjustified, prompting the court to nullify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court, in Criminal Revision Application No. 27/2025, quashed the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapadvanj, which had directed seizure of a vehicle under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court's order violated the Gujarat Prohibition (Liquor Samples and Determination of Quantity Seized Liquor) Rules, 2012, which mandate that seized liquor exceeding 20 liters cannot be finally confiscated until a conclusive judgment is delivered. Since the final judgment had not been rendered in the underlying criminal case, the seizure order was premature and legally unjustified, prompting the court to nullify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case