STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHKUMAR ALIAS PRAVIN KANABHAI GOHIL Advocate - M N CHHASATIYA — 25/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(m). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJKH180009842025
Filing Number
25/2025
Filing Date
02-09-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204027250095
Police Station
KATHLAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. M R PATEL
Respondent(s)
PRAKASHKUMAR ALIAS PRAVIN KANABHAI GOHIL Advocate - M N CHHASATIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 25/2025 The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused, Prakashkumar Uday Prvin Kanabhai Gohil, of charges under the Indian Penal Code Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(a) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 Sections 3(a), 4, 5(a), 6, 12. The court found that prosecution failed to prove the child victim's age at the time of the alleged offense and that state witnesses' testimony did not adequately support the charges, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 25/2025 The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused, Prakashkumar Uday Prvin Kanabhai Gohil, of charges under the Indian Penal Code Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(a) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 Sections 3(a), 4, 5(a), 6, 12. The court found that prosecution failed to prove the child victim's age at the time of the alleged offense and that state witnesses' testimony did not adequately support the charges, rendering the case insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts