CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL vs JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK — 12/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJKH180003522024
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL
Adv. K D SHROFF
Respondent(s)
JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK
REVABHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL
Adv. J U MALEK
JAGDISHBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL
Adv. J U MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts