CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL vs JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK — 12/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH180003522024

Case disposed

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

19-04-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

19-04-2024

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL

Adv. K D SHROFF

Respondent(s)

JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK

REVABHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL

Adv. J U MALEK

JAGDISHBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL

Adv. J U MALEK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

25-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

10-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case