CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL vs JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK — 12/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJKH180003522024
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
19-Apr-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
19-Apr-2024
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRAKANT SHANKARBHAI PATEL
Adv. K D SHROFF
Respondent(s)
-
1.JASHUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL Advocate - J U MALEK
-
2.REVABHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL
Adv. J U MALEK
-
3.JAGDISHBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL
Adv. J U MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
30-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
For R&P
Addl. District Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
For R&P
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Order On Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Order On Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
03-May-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
26-Dec-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
15-Oct-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
08-Oct-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Admission/Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Order On Interim Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2024
Case Summary: RCA No. 12/2024 Petitioner: Chandrakant Shankarbhai Patel Respondents: Jashuabhai Gopalbhai Patel (1st), Revabhai Gopalbhai Patel (2nd), Jagdishbhai Gopalbhai Patel (3rd) The appellate court set aside the trial court's order denying the petitioner's land ownership claim, finding the lower court committed serious errors in evaluating evidence and misapplied law. The court held the petitioner established documentary proof of unbroken possession and agricultural tenancy rights over the disputed property since 1993, with supporting revenue records, cooperative bank loan documents, and cultivation receipts. The lower court's failure to properly consider these authenticated documents and its erroneous judgment violated established legal principles, warranting reversal and acceptance of the appeal with the petitioner declared rightful land owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts