NAINABEN RAJUBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 48/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH180002252026

Case disposed

Filing Number

48/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204006260047

Police Station

ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

NAINABEN RAJUBHAI PATEL

Adv. M A SHAIKH

KOMALBEN HITESHBHAI PATEL

Adv. M A SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRMA No. 48/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the criminal revision petition and DISMISSED the application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioners Nainaben Rajubhai Patel and Komalben Hiteshbhai Patel. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charges registered under IPC sections 148, 149, 151, 150, 109, 117, and 135, relating to unlawful assembly and causing grievous injuries to the victim and his associate. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused and co-accused formed an organized mob and inflicted brutal injuries on the complainant and his brother-in-law using sticks and lathis with criminal intent. The investigation is ongoing, and premature bail could compromise it. The court noted the accused's good family background but found these factors insufficient to override the serious nature of the charges and risk of absconding, particularly given the organized and violent nature of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 48/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the criminal revision petition and DISMISSED the application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioners Nainaben Rajubhai Patel and Komalben Hiteshbhai Patel. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charges registered under IPC sections 148, 149, 151, 150, 109, 117, and 135, relating to unlawful assembly and causing grievous injuries to the victim and his associate. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused and co-accused formed an organized mob and inflicted brutal injuries on the complainant and his brother-in-law using sticks and lathis with criminal intent. The investigation is ongoing, and premature bail could compromise it. The court noted the accused's good family background but found these factors insufficient to override the serious nature of the charges and risk of absconding, particularly given the organized and violent nature of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case