NAINABEN RAJUBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 48/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH180002252026
Filing Number
48/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204006260047
Police Station
ATTARSUMBA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAINABEN RAJUBHAI PATEL
Adv. M A SHAIKH
KOMALBEN HITESHBHAI PATEL
Adv. M A SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 48/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the criminal revision petition and DISMISSED the application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioners Nainaben Rajubhai Patel and Komalben Hiteshbhai Patel. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charges registered under IPC sections 148, 149, 151, 150, 109, 117, and 135, relating to unlawful assembly and causing grievous injuries to the victim and his associate. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused and co-accused formed an organized mob and inflicted brutal injuries on the complainant and his brother-in-law using sticks and lathis with criminal intent. The investigation is ongoing, and premature bail could compromise it. The court noted the accused's good family background but found these factors insufficient to override the serious nature of the charges and risk of absconding, particularly given the organized and violent nature of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 48/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the criminal revision petition and DISMISSED the application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioners Nainaben Rajubhai Patel and Komalben Hiteshbhai Patel. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charges registered under IPC sections 148, 149, 151, 150, 109, 117, and 135, relating to unlawful assembly and causing grievous injuries to the victim and his associate. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused and co-accused formed an organized mob and inflicted brutal injuries on the complainant and his brother-in-law using sticks and lathis with criminal intent. The investigation is ongoing, and premature bail could compromise it. The court noted the accused's good family background but found these factors insufficient to override the serious nature of the charges and risk of absconding, particularly given the organized and violent nature of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts