JAYRAJSINH ASHWINBHAI ZALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 47/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH180002242026
Filing Number
47/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204027250766
Police Station
KATHLAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYRAJSINH ASHWINBHAI ZALA
Adv. M R TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 47/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to petitioner Jayrajsinh Ashwinbhai Zala under Section 438 of the Indian Penal Code, subject to conditions including furnishing a regular bond. The court found that while serious charges were registered (attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and related offenses), the petitioner's circumstances—as a local resident with family ties, steady income, and no history of misconduct—warranted bail rather than continued custody, particularly given the risk of witness tampering if the accused remained incarcerated alongside co-accused. Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner had not directly participated in the violent incident, was employed locally, had established community ties, and faced potential danger if held in custody. The court also noted that the investigation had progressed sufficiently to proceed without continued detention, and ordered the regular bail petition to be processed with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 47/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to petitioner Jayrajsinh Ashwinbhai Zala under Section 438 of the Indian Penal Code, subject to conditions including furnishing a regular bond. The court found that while serious charges were registered (attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and related offenses), the petitioner's circumstances—as a local resident with family ties, steady income, and no history of misconduct—warranted bail rather than continued custody, particularly given the risk of witness tampering if the accused remained incarcerated alongside co-accused. Key Reasoning: The court considered that the petitioner had not directly participated in the violent incident, was employed locally, had established community ties, and faced potential danger if held in custody. The court also noted that the investigation had progressed sufficiently to proceed without continued detention, and ordered the regular bail petition to be processed with appropriate safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts