SHAMBHUSINH JAGATSINH RATHOD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 42/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH180001872026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj
Judge
1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAMBHUSINH JAGATSINH RATHOD
Adv. A V PARMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In CRMA No. 42/2026, the Kapadvanj (Kheda) court in Gujarat approved a regular bail application for accused persons charged with illegal liquor manufacturing and distribution under the Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(e), 65(a), 116, 81, 83, 88(2), and other provisions. The court found that while cognizable offenses were registered, the accused had been in custody during investigation and bail was justified as the investigation was in preliminary stages. The court granted bail with conditions including surrender of seized vehicle documents and personal bonds, emphasizing that continued detention was neither legally justified nor necessary to prevent further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In CRMA No. 42/2026, the Kapadvanj (Kheda) court in Gujarat approved a regular bail application for accused persons charged with illegal liquor manufacturing and distribution under the Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(e), 65(a), 116, 81, 83, 88(2), and other provisions. The court found that while cognizable offenses were registered, the accused had been in custody during investigation and bail was justified as the investigation was in preliminary stages. The court granted bail with conditions including surrender of seized vehicle documents and personal bonds, emphasizing that continued detention was neither legally justified nor necessary to prevent further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts