INDRAJITSINH AMARSINH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 41/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH180001862026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDRAJITSINH AMARSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. K G RAULJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court approved the anticipatory bail application of the accused under Section 438 of the CrPC. The accused was arrested in a case involving alleged assault and abduction of a victim, with charges under the IPC and other statutes. However, the court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement and determined they posed no flight risk, being a local resident with stable employment. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety and several conditions, including mandatory police cooperation, court appearance, and passport deposit where applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court approved the anticipatory bail application of the accused under Section 438 of the CrPC. The accused was arrested in a case involving alleged assault and abduction of a victim, with charges under the IPC and other statutes. However, the court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement and determined they posed no flight risk, being a local resident with stable employment. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety and several conditions, including mandatory police cooperation, court appearance, and passport deposit where applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case