BHALABHAI JESANGBHAI NAYAK vs TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - S R SHELAT — 17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH180001822026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHALABHAI JESANGBHAI NAYAK

    Adv. N B MISTRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - S R SHELAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Additional District Court at Kapadwanj approved a compromise order in the insurance claim case of Bhalabhai Jeshangbhai Nayak against Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., awarding him Rs. 9,21,000. The court ordered Rs. 4,60,500 to be paid directly via RTGS/NEFT to the applicant's bank account and an equal amount (Rs. 4,60,500) to be invested in a 5-year Fixed Deposit in his name, with periodic interest accrual and restrictions on borrowing against the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Court at Kapadwanj approved a compromise order in the insurance claim case of Bhalabhai Jeshangbhai Nayak against Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., awarding him Rs. 9,21,000. The court ordered Rs. 4,60,500 to be paid directly via RTGS/NEFT to the applicant's bank account and an equal amount (Rs. 4,60,500) to be invested in a 5-year Fixed Deposit in his name, with periodic interest accrual and restrictions on borrowing against the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case