SOHELKHAN ZAHIRKHAN PATHAN vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL — 3/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH180001102026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Addl. District Court,Kapadvanj

Judge

1-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOHELKHAN ZAHIRKHAN PATHAN

    Adv. S A KAZI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M R PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case CR.RA No. 03/2026 The court allowed Sohelkhan Zahirkhan Pathan's criminal revision appeal against the State of Gujarat, setting aside the lower court's order that rejected his petition for release of frozen funds under Section 438 of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that Rs. 31,400 seized during a cybercrime investigation should be released to the petitioner, as he is an impoverished person with legitimate livelihood needs, and found no evidence of his involvement in the alleged crime or that the funds were proceeds of crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Order On Urgent Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CR.RA No. 03/2026 The court allowed Sohelkhan Zahirkhan Pathan's criminal revision appeal against the State of Gujarat, setting aside the lower court's order that rejected his petition for release of frozen funds under Section 438 of the Indian Penal Code. The court found that Rs. 31,400 seized during a cybercrime investigation should be released to the petitioner, as he is an impoverished person with legitimate livelihood needs, and found no evidence of his involvement in the alleged crime or that the funds were proceeds of crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case