Bhagawatiben D/o.Pravibhai Meghajibhai Patel W/o.Natvarlal Ambalal Patel vs Lakhiben D/o.Nanabhai Pujabhai Parmar Advocate - R.J.SONI — 35/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH170020022017
Filing Number
35/2017
Filing Date
15-07-2010
Registration No
35/2017
Registration Date
15-07-2010
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagawatiben D/o.Pravibhai Meghajibhai Patel W/o.Natvarlal Ambalal Patel
Adv. K.N.PATEL
Respondent(s)
Lakhiben D/o.Nanabhai Pujabhai Parmar Advocate - R.J.SONI
Doliben D/o.Maganbhai Pujabhai Parmar
Nanduben D/o.Maganbhai Pujabhai Parmar
Champabem D/o.Maganbhai Pujabhai Parmar
Revaben D/o.Maganbhai Pujabhai Parmar
Knowing women as Sudhaben W/o.Rangitbhai Nanabhai Parmar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 35/2017 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner (Bhagawatiben) a declaration of title and perpetual injunction protecting her ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 514/1, Sonippur village, Thasra taluka, Kheda district). The court restrained respondents from interfering with the petitioner's cultivation rights and ordered them to bear case costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner established her legal ownership and direct possession of the disputed land through registered sale deed (dated 09/09/2005) and continuous cultivation. Respondents failed to produce credible evidence challenging these claims or proving their alleged ownership rights. The court applied principles of equity and the Specific Relief Act, determining that perpetual injunction was necessary since monetary compensation would not adequately protect the petitioner's agricultural interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 35/2017 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner (Bhagawatiben) a declaration of title and perpetual injunction protecting her ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 514/1, Sonippur village, Thasra taluka, Kheda district). The court restrained respondents from interfering with the petitioner's cultivation rights and ordered them to bear case costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner established her legal ownership and direct possession of the disputed land through registered sale deed (dated 09/09/2005) and continuous cultivation. Respondents failed to produce credible evidence challenging these claims or proving their alleged ownership rights. The court applied principles of equity and the Specific Relief Act, determining that perpetual injunction was necessary since monetary compensation would not adequately protect the petitioner's agricultural interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts