JELIBEN GOKALBHAI @ SOMABHAI PARMAR vs RAMABHAI DHULABHAI PARMAR Advocate - B P PUROHIT — 38/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH170007022018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
38/2018
Filing Date
01-11-2018
Registration No
38/2018
Registration Date
01-11-2018
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JELIBEN GOKALBHAI @ SOMABHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
RAMESHBHAI GOKALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K N PATEL
HASMUKHBHAI GOKALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
CHAMPABEN BIJALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
MAHENDRABHAI BIJALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
PRAVINBHAI BIJALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
MUNNIBEN BIJALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
RAMILABEN MANGALBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K.N.PATEL
Respondent(s)
RAMABHAI DHULABHAI PARMAR Advocate - B P PUROHIT
LALABHAI DHULABHAI PARMAR
MAHESHBHAI ISHWARBHAI @ DHULABHAI PARMAR
PRAVINBHAI RAMABHAI PARMAR
SHANABHAI RAMABHAI PARMAR
SHANTABEN MANGALBHAI PARMAR
KANTIBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 38/2018 The plaintiffs sought an interim injunction against defendants regarding ancestral property in Khuni village, alleging the defendants were encroaching on the property without lawful right. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, and risk of irreparable loss. The application was partly allowed, directing both parties to maintain status quo of the disputed property until final suit disposal, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 38/2018 The plaintiffs sought an interim injunction against defendants regarding ancestral property in Khuni village, alleging the defendants were encroaching on the property without lawful right. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, and risk of irreparable loss. The application was partly allowed, directing both parties to maintain status quo of the disputed property until final suit disposal, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts