KISHORBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL vs JITENDRABHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL Advocate - S.R.MALEK — 12/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH170003642019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2019
Filing Date
01-05-2019
Registration No
12/2019
Registration Date
01-05-2019
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHORBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL
Adv. K.N.PATEL
Respondent(s)
JITENDRABHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL Advocate - S.R.MALEK
DASHRATHBHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court held that when a plaintiff requests video evidence from CCTV footage, court fees must be paid as per the prescribed rates, and the plaintiff is obligated to bear these costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's request to waive or reduce the court fees, ordering the plaintiff to pay the required fees to proceed with obtaining the video evidence from case file Annex-28 and subsequent proceedings. The matter was adjourned to March 14, 2026, with directions for the plaintiff to comply with fee payment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court held that when a plaintiff requests video evidence from CCTV footage, court fees must be paid as per the prescribed rates, and the plaintiff is obligated to bear these costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's request to waive or reduce the court fees, ordering the plaintiff to pay the required fees to proceed with obtaining the video evidence from case file Annex-28 and subsequent proceedings. The matter was adjourned to March 14, 2026, with directions for the plaintiff to comply with fee payment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts