DILIPKUMAR RANVIRSINH SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 40/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKH170001942026

Case disposed

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Galteshwar

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204067250172

Police Station

SEVALIYA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

DILIPKUMAR RANVIRSINH SOLANKI

Adv. A R MAHIDA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

12-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
ORDER

The court rejected the bail application of accused Dilipkumar Ranvirsinh Solanki, who was charged with misappropriating ₹73,93,342 by fraudulently obtaining re-loans using previously sanctioned loan documents and diverting company funds for personal use during his employment. The court found the charges under IPC sections 316(4), 54, 335(2), 335(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2)(a) serious and substantial, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would have a negative social impact, particularly given the gravity and nature of the financial crime involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Dilipkumar Ranvirsinh Solanki, who was charged with misappropriating ₹73,93,342 by fraudulently obtaining re-loans using previously sanctioned loan documents and diverting company funds for personal use during his employment. The court found the charges under IPC sections 316(4), 54, 335(2), 335(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2)(a) serious and substantial, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would have a negative social impact, particularly given the gravity and nature of the financial crime involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Taluka Court, Galteshwar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case