DILIPKUMAR RANVIRSINH SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 40/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKH170001942026

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Galteshwar

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204067250172

Police Station

SEVALIYA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIPKUMAR RANVIRSINH SOLANKI

    Adv. A R MAHIDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of accused Dilipkumar Ranvirsinh Solanki, who was charged with misappropriating ₹73,93,342 by fraudulently obtaining re-loans using previously sanctioned loan documents and diverting company funds for personal use during his employment. The court found the charges under IPC sections 316(4), 54, 335(2), 335(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2)(a) serious and substantial, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would have a negative social impact, particularly given the gravity and nature of the financial crime involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Dilipkumar Ranvirsinh Solanki, who was charged with misappropriating ₹73,93,342 by fraudulently obtaining re-loans using previously sanctioned loan documents and diverting company funds for personal use during his employment. The court found the charges under IPC sections 316(4), 54, 335(2), 335(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2)(a) serious and substantial, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would have a negative social impact, particularly given the gravity and nature of the financial crime involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case