JAITUNBIBI W/O USMANBHAI AHMEDBHAI KURESHI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 39/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKH170001932026
Filing Number
39/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204067250510
Police Station
SEVALIYA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAITUNBIBI W/O USMANBHAI AHMEDBHAI KURESHI
Adv. M M BELIM
SHABERABIBI W/O RABBANIBHAI AHMEDABAD KURESHI
RAJIYABANU W/O AZRUDDIN URFE AJAR MAHEMUDBHAI KURESHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 39/2026 (CRMA No. 121/2025): The court rejected the bail application of the three female petitioners accused of illegal animal slaughter without proper authorization. While the defense argued the accused were innocent and faced false charges, the court found the accusations grave—involving unauthorized cow slaughter, beef possession, and beef sale—which constitute serious offenses under Gujarat law with enhanced sentencing provisions under 2017 amendments. The court upheld bail denial, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and rejecting arguments that bail should be granted without examining prima facie evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 39/2026 (CRMA No. 121/2025): The court rejected the bail application of the three female petitioners accused of illegal animal slaughter without proper authorization. While the defense argued the accused were innocent and faced false charges, the court found the accusations grave—involving unauthorized cow slaughter, beef possession, and beef sale—which constitute serious offenses under Gujarat law with enhanced sentencing provisions under 2017 amendments. The court upheld bail denial, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and rejecting arguments that bail should be granted without examining prima facie evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts