JAITUNBIBI W/O USMANBHAI AHMEDBHAI KURESHI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 39/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKH170001932026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Galteshwar

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204067250510

Police Station

SEVALIYA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAITUNBIBI W/O USMANBHAI AHMEDBHAI KURESHI

    Adv. M M BELIM

  2. 2.SHABERABIBI W/O RABBANIBHAI AHMEDABAD KURESHI

  3. 3.RAJIYABANU W/O AZRUDDIN URFE AJAR MAHEMUDBHAI KURESHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 39/2026 (CRMA No. 121/2025): The court rejected the bail application of the three female petitioners accused of illegal animal slaughter without proper authorization. While the defense argued the accused were innocent and faced false charges, the court found the accusations grave—involving unauthorized cow slaughter, beef possession, and beef sale—which constitute serious offenses under Gujarat law with enhanced sentencing provisions under 2017 amendments. The court upheld bail denial, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and rejecting arguments that bail should be granted without examining prima facie evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 39/2026 (CRMA No. 121/2025): The court rejected the bail application of the three female petitioners accused of illegal animal slaughter without proper authorization. While the defense argued the accused were innocent and faced false charges, the court found the accusations grave—involving unauthorized cow slaughter, beef possession, and beef sale—which constitute serious offenses under Gujarat law with enhanced sentencing provisions under 2017 amendments. The court upheld bail denial, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and rejecting arguments that bail should be granted without examining prima facie evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case