THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNILBHAI BHIKHABHAI RAVAL — 126/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 504, 506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH170001662023
Filing Number
126/2023
Filing Date
13-02-2023
Registration No
126/2023
Registration Date
13-02-2023
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204067200591
Police Station
SEVALIYA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUNILBHAI BHIKHABHAI RAVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.NO.126/2023 State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Bhikhabhai Raval The court acquitted the accused Sunilbhai Bhikhabhai Raval of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, and 506(2) for alleged assault, abusive language, and criminal intimidation on 14 September 2020 in Sonippur village. The prosecution failed to establish the accusations beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence from witnesses, including hostile witnesses presented by the prosecution. The court found that the evidence could not conclusively prove the accused's guilt and ordered his release with bond conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO.126/2023 State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Bhikhabhai Raval The court acquitted the accused Sunilbhai Bhikhabhai Raval of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, and 506(2) for alleged assault, abusive language, and criminal intimidation on 14 September 2020 in Sonippur village. The prosecution failed to establish the accusations beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence from witnesses, including hostile witnesses presented by the prosecution. The court found that the evidence could not conclusively prove the accused's guilt and ordered his release with bond conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts