JITENDRABHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL vs DASHRATHBHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL Advocate - K.N.PATEL — 3/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH170000272020
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2020
Filing Date
18-01-2020
Registration No
3/2020
Registration Date
18-01-2020
Court
Taluka Court, Galteshwar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRABHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL
Adv. S R MALEK
Respondent(s)
DASHRATHBHAI KISHORBHAI PATEL Advocate - K.N.PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 24-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a complex property dispute case in Gujarati involving two pieces of agricultural land (parcels #363 and #364) in Malvaran village, Galetej Taluka, Kheda District. The court ordered that: 1. Both civil suits partially allowed - The plaintiff's interim relief application regarding possession of the disputed properties was granted, with the defendant ordered to maintain status quo pending final resolution. 2. Key relief - The defendant is restrained from interfering with plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the properties until final judgment is delivered in the main case. 3. Costs reserved - No final decision on litigation costs was made at this stage, to be determined upon final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a complex property dispute case in Gujarati involving two pieces of agricultural land (parcels #363 and #364) in Malvaran village, Galetej Taluka, Kheda District. The court ordered that: 1. Both civil suits partially allowed - The plaintiff's interim relief application regarding possession of the disputed properties was granted, with the defendant ordered to maintain status quo pending final resolution. 2. Key relief - The defendant is restrained from interfering with plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the properties until final judgment is delivered in the main case. 3. Costs reserved - No final decision on litigation costs was made at this stage, to be determined upon final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts