SARPANCH SHRI, PIJ vs INDRAVADAN HIRALAL SHAH Advocate - S M MALEK — 25/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH160006812023

Filing Number

25/2023

Filing Date

20-Dec-2023

Registration No

25/2023

Registration Date

20-Dec-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARPANCH SHRI, PIJ

    Adv. V M MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDRAVADAN HIRALAL SHAH Advocate - S M MALEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 25/2023 Court Decision: The court dismissed the Sarpanch's petition seeking removal of a door constructed by the respondent on his property's south side. The court held that the door does not obstruct public passage, no other residents complained, and the Gram Panchayat had previously approved the door as appropriate in a 2021 resolution, thereby precluding the present suit by the doctrine of estoppel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 03-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 01-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 25-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 10-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 02-Aug-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 28-Jun-2024

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 08-May-2024

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 23-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 15-Feb-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 17-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 20-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 25/2023 Court Decision: The court dismissed the Sarpanch's petition seeking removal of a door constructed by the respondent on his property's south side. The court held that the door does not obstruct public passage, no other residents complained, and the Gram Panchayat had previously approved the door as appropriate in a 2021 resolution, thereby precluding the present suit by the doctrine of estoppel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case