RANJANBEN SURENDRABHAI PATEL vs KOKILABEN SURENDRABHAI PATEL(Dead) Advocate - J.S.MECWAN — 40/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160005762018
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2018
Filing Date
03-11-2018
Registration No
40/2018
Registration Date
03-11-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANJANBEN SURENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. K.K.MAHIDA
Respondent(s)
KOKILABEN SURENDRABHAI PATEL(Dead) Advocate - J.S.MECWAN
SITABEN SURENDRAHAI PATEL
DEEPALIBEN SURENDRABHAI PATEL
KRUNALKUMAR SURENDRABHAI PATEL
MINAXIBEN PRAFULBHAI PATEL(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint)
VISHAL PRAFULBHAI PATEL(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint)
JANAVIBEN RAJKUMAR PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 40-2018 before the Principal Civil Judge, Vaso (District Kheda), the court issued an order dated 21/11/2024 regarding a dispute between Ranjanben (widow of Surendrabhai Manubhai Patel) and Sitaben Surendrabhai Patel. The court directed the plaintiff to deposit half of the decretal amount as security and ordered the case to proceed on merits. The court also directed that if the plaintiff complies with the deposit requirement, the suit will be admitted and the matter will be heard on its substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 40-2018 before the Principal Civil Judge, Vaso (District Kheda), the court issued an order dated 21/11/2024 regarding a dispute between Ranjanben (widow of Surendrabhai Manubhai Patel) and Sitaben Surendrabhai Patel. The court directed the plaintiff to deposit half of the decretal amount as security and ordered the case to proceed on merits. The court also directed that if the plaintiff complies with the deposit requirement, the suit will be admitted and the matter will be heard on its substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts