PATEL SANJAYKUMAR KANTIBHAI vs RAKESHKUMAR CHIMANBHAI PATEL Advocate - N.G.BHATT — 52/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160005552019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
52/2019
Filing Date
17-12-2019
Registration No
52/2019
Registration Date
17-12-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL SANJAYKUMAR KANTIBHAI
Adv. R.B.PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
RAKESHKUMAR CHIMANBHAI PATEL Advocate - N.G.BHATT
PRAKASHKUMAR CHIMANBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-11-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit with costs. The plaintiff (Sanjay Kumar Kantibhai Patel) failed to establish his claim that he had inherited rights to 0-24-00 guntha of land (part of survey no. 619, Khandhli village, Vasad taluka) from his deceased father. The court found that this land had been lawfully divided among the deceased landowner's four sons in 1982, with the defendants (Rakesh and Prakash Chimanbhai Patel) inheriting the full survey no. 619 through proper revenue partition records. Since the plaintiff had not objected to this partition for 37 years, he was barred by the law of limitation from now claiming possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit with costs. The plaintiff (Sanjay Kumar Kantibhai Patel) failed to establish his claim that he had inherited rights to 0-24-00 guntha of land (part of survey no. 619, Khandhli village, Vasad taluka) from his deceased father. The court found that this land had been lawfully divided among the deceased landowner's four sons in 1982, with the defendants (Rakesh and Prakash Chimanbhai Patel) inheriting the full survey no. 619 through proper revenue partition records. Since the plaintiff had not objected to this partition for 37 years, he was barred by the law of limitation from now claiming possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts