PRAVINBHAI SULEMANBHAI RATHOD vs KIRITBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR Advocate - S T PATELIYA — 34/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160005402018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2018
Filing Date
09-10-2018
Registration No
34/2018
Registration Date
09-10-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
RAMESHBHAI PITARBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
SEVAKBHAI SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
PREMILABEN SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
SUMITRABEN SULEMANBHAI RATHOD
Adv. D B AUTHOR
Respondent(s)
KIRITBHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR Advocate - S T PATELIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The court granted the plaintiffs' suit to protect their possession and ownership of agricultural land (0-03-80 area) in Zaroli village, Kheda district. The court ruled that the plaintiffs are the lawful owners and possessors of the property with four houses (property numbers 195, 196, 197, 198) and the surrounding land, and restrained the defendants from interfering with their possession or making any claims to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The court granted the plaintiffs' suit to protect their possession and ownership of agricultural land (0-03-80 area) in Zaroli village, Kheda district. The court ruled that the plaintiffs are the lawful owners and possessors of the property with four houses (property numbers 195, 196, 197, 198) and the surrounding land, and restrained the defendants from interfering with their possession or making any claims to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts