NAVINBHAI TRIKAMBHAI PATEL vs MAHAKALI JEWELLERS PROPRIETOR MINESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI SONI Advocate - B T PATEL — 335/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH160005152024

Filing Number

335/2024

Filing Date

25-Nov-2024

Registration No

335/2024

Registration Date

25-Nov-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVINBHAI TRIKAMBHAI PATEL

    Adv. C S SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHAKALI JEWELLERS PROPRIETOR MINESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI SONI Advocate - B T PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: C.C.NO.335/2024 The court convicted the accused (Mineshbhai Hasmukhbhai Soni) under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing two post-dated cheques (₹4 lakhs total) that were returned unpaid with "Payment Stopped By" notation. Despite the accused claiming financial constraints and attempting to make payments later, the court found he violated the Act by providing cheques without legal authority while claiming they secured a lawful debt. The accused was sentenced to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹8 lakhs compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 31-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 31-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 03-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 25-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 335/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO.335/2024 The court convicted the accused (Mineshbhai Hasmukhbhai Soni) under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing two post-dated cheques (₹4 lakhs total) that were returned unpaid with "Payment Stopped By" notation. Despite the accused claiming financial constraints and attempting to make payments later, the court found he violated the Act by providing cheques without legal authority while claiming they secured a lawful debt. The accused was sentenced to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹8 lakhs compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case