SHIVKRUPA FINANCE PROPRIETOR GEETABEN MITESHBHAI RANA vs SORAMKUMARI KHETARAM MARWADI Advocate - H R MAHERIA — 402/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160004882025
Filing Number
402/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
402/2025
Registration Date
28-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIVKRUPA FINANCE PROPRIETOR GEETABEN MITESHBHAI RANA
Adv. S M MALEK
Respondent(s)
SORAMKUMARI KHETARAM MARWADI Advocate - H R MAHERIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 402/2025 The court found the accused guilty of cheating and breach of trust under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The petitioner (Shivkrupa Finance) alleged that the accused obtained a loan of Rs. 42,000 by issuing a post-dated check that was subsequently dishonored. The court determined that the accused failed to prove legitimate repayment of the loan, and the check was returned with "insufficient funds." The accused was convicted and ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 as compensation plus a three-month jail sentence for violating the Negotiable Instruments Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. No. 402/2025 The court found the accused guilty of cheating and breach of trust under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The petitioner (Shivkrupa Finance) alleged that the accused obtained a loan of Rs. 42,000 by issuing a post-dated check that was subsequently dishonored. The court determined that the accused failed to prove legitimate repayment of the loan, and the check was returned with "insufficient funds." The accused was convicted and ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 as compensation plus a three-month jail sentence for violating the Negotiable Instruments Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts