RINKESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI PATEL vs NASIB POLTRYFEED — 392/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160004772025
Filing Number
392/2025
Filing Date
25-Aug-2025
Registration No
392/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RINKESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI PATEL
Adv. J A MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.NASIB POLTRYFEED
-
2.NASIB POLTRYFEED AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MASUD GAFURBHAI BADI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioner Rinkeshkumar Jagdishbhai Patel's plea requesting that the case not proceed further against respondent Nasib Poltryfeed. The court ordered costs/fees to be paid by the petitioner vide its order dated 02/05/2025. The petition was rejected as the settlement already reached between the parties was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 392/2025
The court dismissed the petitioner Rinkeshkumar Jagdishbhai Patel's plea requesting that the case not proceed further against respondent Nasib Poltryfeed. The court ordered costs/fees to be paid by the petitioner vide its order dated 02/05/2025. The petition was rejected as the settlement already reached between the parties was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts