THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - C K BHOI — 295/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH160004542024

Filing Number

295/2024

Filing Date

04-Oct-2024

Registration No

295/2024

Registration Date

04-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VASO

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - C K BHOI

  2. 2.RAIJIBHAI ADITBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. C K BHOI

  3. 3.FATABHAI ADITBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. C K BHOI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Rameshbhai, Raizbhai, and Fatabhbhai Solankis) of charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while the complainant's testimony and some documentary evidence were presented, they were contradicted by cross-examination findings and witness inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 15-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 20-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 30-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 18-Nov-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 07-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 04-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 295/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Rameshbhai, Raizbhai, and Fatabhbhai Solankis) of charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while the complainant's testimony and some documentary evidence were presented, they were contradicted by cross-examination findings and witness inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case