THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - C K BHOI — 295/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH160004542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
295/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
295/2024
Registration Date
04-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - C K BHOI
RAIJIBHAI ADITBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. C K BHOI
FATABHAI ADITBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. C K BHOI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Rameshbhai, Raizbhai, and Fatabhbhai Solankis) of charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while the complainant's testimony and some documentary evidence were presented, they were contradicted by cross-examination findings and witness inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Rameshbhai, Raizbhai, and Fatabhbhai Solankis) of charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judge determined that while the complainant's testimony and some documentary evidence were presented, they were contradicted by cross-examination findings and witness inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts