REVABEN MOHANBHAI PARMAR vs RAVJIBHAI SHAKRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - C.G.SHARMA — 20/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160004512021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2021
Filing Date
28-10-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
28-10-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
REVABEN MOHANBHAI PARMAR
Adv. A.A.BRAHMBHATT
VIMALABEN MOHANBHAI PARMAR
Respondent(s)
RAVJIBHAI SHAKRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - C.G.SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking possession of agricultural land they claimed was illegally occupied by the defendant. The court found that the plaintiffs' deceased father had voluntarily transferred the land to the defendant through an unregistered deed of gift, with the defendant providing financial support for the father's medical care and daughters' marriages, thereby establishing valid consideration for the transfer. The court ordered the defendant to execute a registered deed of gift to formalize the original agreement, rejecting the plaintiffs' claims as time-barred and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking possession of agricultural land they claimed was illegally occupied by the defendant. The court found that the plaintiffs' deceased father had voluntarily transferred the land to the defendant through an unregistered deed of gift, with the defendant providing financial support for the father's medical care and daughters' marriages, thereby establishing valid consideration for the transfer. The court ordered the defendant to execute a registered deed of gift to formalize the original agreement, rejecting the plaintiffs' claims as time-barred and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts