JAYESHBHAI RAMANBHAI VALAND vs CHANDNIBEN ASHISHKUMAR PATEL — 4/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61, 314, 316. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 15th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJKH160004472025
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
05-08-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
05-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYESHBHAI RAMANBHAI VALAND
Adv. D K THAKAR
Respondent(s)
CHANDNIBEN ASHISHKUMAR PATEL
HIREN MOTLA
ALKA HIREN MOTLA
NILKABEN SIRISHBHAI DESAI
MUKESHBHAI JANI
JANVI HITESH PATEL
NALINBEN PRAVINBHAI JANI
GHANSHYAMBHAI JASHUBHAI PANCHAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 4/2025 The court dismissed the private complaint filed by Jayeshbhai Ramanbhai Valand against Chandniben Ashishkumar Patel, Hiren Motla, and Alka Hiren Motla under BNS sections 406, 414, and 416 (criminal breach of trust and dishonestly receiving stolen property). The petitioner alleged a work permit visa fraud scheme in Kenya where he paid ₹15 lakh in advance, with a remaining ₹11 lakh due upon receipt of permits that were never delivered. However, the court found the complaint insufficiently supported: the petitioner provided no bank statements, witness list, or witness names to corroborate the allegations, and failed to appear for proceedings, making it impossible to proceed with investigation or issue process against the accused under BNS sections 225 and 227. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 4/2025 The court dismissed the private complaint filed by Jayeshbhai Ramanbhai Valand against Chandniben Ashishkumar Patel, Hiren Motla, and Alka Hiren Motla under BNS sections 406, 414, and 416 (criminal breach of trust and dishonestly receiving stolen property). The petitioner alleged a work permit visa fraud scheme in Kenya where he paid ₹15 lakh in advance, with a remaining ₹11 lakh due upon receipt of permits that were never delivered. However, the court found the complaint insufficiently supported: the petitioner provided no bank statements, witness list, or witness names to corroborate the allegations, and failed to appear for proceedings, making it impossible to proceed with investigation or issue process against the accused under BNS sections 225 and 227. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts